Time Travel With Your Fridge?

Jimena Canales is a faculty member of the Graduate College at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign and a research affiliate at MIT. She focuses on 19th and 20th-century history of the physical sciences and science in the modern world. Her most recent book is titled The Physicist and the Philosopher: Einstein, Bergson and the Debate That Changed Our Understanding of Time. You can learn more about her here.

Since H.G. Wells combined the words “time travel” — and used them so systematically to refer to using a machine to travel to a certain date in the calendar — in The Time Machine in 1895, scientists and the public at large have been fascinated with its possibility.

Establishing the rules of time-traveling became part of science in the 19th century. Albert Einstein famously entered these debates, showing us how we could do it. So did the late Stephen Hawking, who wrote a children’s book with his daughter about time travel. And Kip S. Thorne (winner of the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics), too, filling Black Holes & Time Warps with adventures of going down a wormhole where “within a fraction of your second of your own time you will arrive on Earth, in the era of your youth 4 billion years ago.” Many other cosmologists and physicists have followed suit, crafting stunning narratives and imagining new laboratory experiments to test them out.

Sign Up For The NPR Daily Newsletter
Catch up on the latest headlines and unique NPR stories, sent every weekday.

E-mail address
What’s your email?
By subscribing, you agree to NPR’s terms of use and privacy policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Quantum mechanics gives us particular time-traveling options, that differ from those of relativity theory, by showing how we can fidget with entangled atomic properties. “Physicists Demonstrate How to Reverse of the Arrow of Time,” ran a recent headline in MIT Technology Review, while “‘Arrow of time’ reversed in quantum experiment,” was the headline used by Science News.

In these experiments, time is reversed because scientists can make a cold object heat up a hotter one. Thus, these experiments promise to be an entryway into yet another area traditionally considered the realm of science fiction: perpetual motion. But a Second-Law-of-Thermodynamics-breaking-gadget might not be just right around the corner. Even less likely is one that will reverse time.

The announcement relies on the assumption that our sense of time is due to the law of entropy, which is commonly used to explain the “arrow of time.”

In the 19th century, scientists’ speculations about how they might go about actually reversing time started reaching wide audiences. In a landmark lecture published in the journal Nature on April 9, 1874, the physicist and engineer William Thomson (known as Lord Kelvin) described how the world would look if it suddenly started running in reverse:

“The bursting bubble of foam at the foot of a waterfall would reunite and descend into the water … Boulders would recover from the mud the materials required to build them into their previous jagged forms, and would become reunited to the mountain peat from which they had formerly broken away … living creatures would grow backwards, with conscious knowledge of the future, but no memory of the past, and would become again unborn.”

Scientists of the Victorian era concluded that the reason why time flowed in one direction was the same one that made heat travel from hot to cold. Hence, they came up with the first idea for manipulating time: Manipulate the direction of atoms in motion. New molecular theories of heat taught scientists that the best way to control the movement of atoms was by changing their temperature. While heated objects tend to reach temperature equilibrium, the reverse operation is highly unlikely.

“It is very improbable that in the course of 1,000 years one-half of the bar of iron shall of itself become warmer by a degree than the other half,” explained Thompson. But these effects could sometimes happen spontaneously. Chances were slim, but real. In fact, the molecular view of nature required this possibility to exist. The “probability of this happening before 1,000,000 years pass is 1,000 times as great as that it will happen in the course of 1,000 years, and that it certainly will happen in the course of some very long time,” explained Thomson.

The Victorian public listened to Thomson’s calculations in awe.

Thomson had matured quite a bit as a scientist and intellectual by the time he offered these numbers. As a younger man, he and his brother had chased with jejune enthusiasm a host of possible entropy-busting perpetual motion machines. Their contraptions proved not only to not function at all, but they had often already been thought up by ingenious others. (A friend of James Thomson politely told him he should go back to studying before talking so big: “It seems to me to be nearly as great a waste of time, making attempts at useful discovery without this previous knowledge, as for a person to labour at working out the highest problems in Astronomy without having first gone through the Calculus.” He signed off, “believe me my dear James.”)

But eventually, James’s inventive genius led to significant improvements to water wheels, pumps and turbines. William’s contributions to science, in turn, led him to be elevated to the peerage by Queen Victoria (as first Baron of Kelvin) and to have a temperature scale named after him.